National EAS Test — November 17, 2:20pm ET · it runs through the equipment FCC 47 CFR § 11.35(d) covers
Station Compliance

Station Compliance›47 CFR § 11.35(d)

Plain-language reference

47 CFR § 11.35(d): what the program chain security rule actually requires

Three requirements, one date, and considerably more equipment in scope than most stations have assumed. This page is the reference; nothing on it is behind a paywall.

Reflects the rule as published August 2026. Verify current requirements before relying on any summary.

The short version

On June 29, 2026 the FCC adopted a new paragraph (d) to 47 CFR § 11.35. It was published in the Federal Register on July 31, 2026, and compliance has been required since September 29, 2026.

It requires three things of every EAS Participant: strong passwords, prompt patching, and a firewall or comparable network segmentation limiting remote management access.

It applies to EAS equipment, studio-transmitter link equipment, and any remotely managed equipment that routes, processes, or inserts content into the broadcaster's programming.

That last clause is where most stations have scoped this wrong. It is not a rule about EAS boxes. It is a rule about the program chain, and the EAS box is one device on it.

The three requirements, precisely

1. Password security

Before any use to broadcast to the public, EAS Participants must change any default password, use strong passwords, and change a password whenever there is reason to believe it has been compromised.

The standard for "strong" is specific:

There is an alternative path. A station may instead use alternative authentication measures: look-up secrets, out-of-band devices, one-time passwords, multi-factor or cryptographic authentication. The FCC's FAQ of September 21, 2026 adds two limits: the measure must provide equal or better security than a strong password, and it must be on the equipment itself. A firewall or VPN in front of the device does not count. Equipment that can do neither must be replaced, unless the station obtains a waiver from the Commission.

2. Patching

Test and install security patches and security-related software and firmware upgrades promptly after they become available.

Note the word test. The rule does not ask you to apply a firmware update to a live EAS unit the hour it ships. It asks for a practice, which is a different and more achievable thing — and it means the obligation is ongoing, not something that finishes on September 29.

3. Firewall or network segmentation

Use a network firewall or comparable network segmentation practice that limits remote management access to authorized devices and authorized users.

In a one-rack station this is usually less work than it sounds, and it is almost always the requirement that does the most real good — most of the genuine exposure in a small facility is a port-forwarding rule somebody added years ago for a reason that no longer applies.

Who it applies to

Every EAS Participant. There is no small-station exemption. AM, FM, TV, LPFM, LPTV, Class A, translators and noncommercial stations are all covered. The rule does not scale by staff size, revenue or market rank, and a station with no engineer on payroll is held to the same standard as a group-owned cluster.

What is actually in scope

The rule names three categories. The first two are unambiguous. The third is the one to read carefully:

CategoryWhat it takes in
EAS equipment Your encoder/decoder — DASDEC, Sage ENDEC, and equivalents.
Studio-transmitter link The STL and any backup path, including IP codecs used as STL.
Any remotely managed equipment that routes, processes, or inserts content Automation and playout, audio processing, RDS encoders, streaming encoders, remote broadcast codecs, transmitter remote control and networked exciters, studio routing and consoles, audio-over-IP endpoints — and the switches, routers and firewalls underneath all of it.

The test to apply to any device: is it remotely manageable, and can it affect what goes out over the air? If both are true, it is in scope — whatever kind of box it is and whoever sold it to you.

Two categories of credential are in scope but are not devices at all, and they are the ones stations most reliably miss:

What the rule does not require

This section exists because several vendors are currently implying otherwise.

No filing. § 11.35(d) imposes no new recordkeeping or reporting obligation. There is no form, no certification and no filing deadline for this rule. The one exception is equipment that can neither meet the password requirement nor be replaced: the FCC's FAQ says that needs a waiver, and a waiver is a request you file. If someone tells you the FCC requires you to file a § 11.35(d) compliance document, they are selling you something.

That is not the same as having nothing due. ETRS Form One is due from every EAS Participant on October 30, 2026, and the National EAS Test runs November 17. Both are separate, pre-existing obligations that this rule does not change — see the dates below. Form One has not historically asked about security, and the Commission has announced no change; if that changes, this page will say so.

There is still a good reason to write down what you did — every device decision needs a record, staff turn over, and the person who set the passwords is not always the person answering the question two years later. But that record is for your own file.

No certification exists. Nobody can certify your station compliant with this rule, because the FCC has established no certification scheme for it. Any offer of "FCC-approved" or "certified compliant" status for § 11.35(d) is describing something that does not exist.

No published fine amount. There is no verified forfeiture figure specific to § 11.35(d). The five-figure number that circulates in trade coverage generally attaches to public file violations, which are a different rule. Ask anyone quoting you a number for the citation.

Dates

DateWhat happened
June 29, 2026FCC adopted the Report and Order adding § 11.35(d)
July 31, 2026Published in the Federal Register
September 29, 2026Compliance required
OngoingPatching and credential hygiene are continuing obligations, not a one-time task
October 30, 2026ETRS Form One due from every EAS Participant — a separate, pre-existing obligation, not a § 11.35(d) filing
November 17, 2026National EAS Test, 2:20 pm ET, FEMA via IPAWS — the whole industry exercises this equipment on one afternoon
November 19, 2026ETRS Form Two, 48 hours after the test
January 4, 2027ETRS Form Three

Common questions

Does this require me to file anything?

Not for this rule — there is no reporting or recordkeeping obligation attached to § 11.35(d). The one exception is a device that can neither meet the password requirement nor be replaced, which needs a waiver, and a waiver is a request you file. ETRS Form One is still due October 30, 2026, as it would be anyway; see Dates.

My EAS box is behind a firewall already. Am I done?

Almost certainly not. The firewall requirement is one of three, and it applies to the whole program chain rather than to the EAS unit alone. A station whose EAS box is protected while its STL codec sits on a forwarded port has not met the segmentation requirement.

What if a device cannot take a 15-character password?

Use the alternative-authentication path if the device itself supports one-time passwords, multi-factor or key-based login. If it supports none of them, the FCC's FAQ says it must be replaced, unless you obtain a waiver from the Commission; no waiver process has been published yet. Keeping the device off the public internet is still essential, but it satisfies the segmentation requirement, not this one. Record which route you took in your own file. A device that silently truncates a long password is the dangerous case — it accepts 16 characters, stores 8, and produces a compliance record that is not true. Set a 16-character password and then try logging in with only the first 8; if that works, the device is truncating.

Is a consumer router "comparable network segmentation"?

It can be, if it is actually limiting remote management access rather than forwarding ports to your gear. The question the rule asks is functional, not brand-based: can an unauthorized person on the internet reach a management interface in your chain? Check by trying it from a phone on cellular data.

Does it apply to equipment that is racked but not in use?

If it is powered and networked, treat it as in scope. Dormant equipment is the least likely to have had its firmware touched and the most likely to still carry a factory credential.

Equipment-specific notes

Some common broadcast equipment has documented, verifiable security behavior worth knowing before you start:

If you would rather not work it out from the regulation

The Program Chain Compliance Kit is the implementation version of this page: a 90-minute start-here path, a verified device reference for common broadcast gear, three network segmentation patterns for a one-rack station, and the worksheets — inventory, port-forwarding audit, compliance memo, short-password device records — already written.

See what is in the kit — $149